结果 Sandwicherie 洛杉矶

GJUSTA

三明治店 €€
3.6/5
25 意见
开放式 - 从07h00 到16h00 时间表

到达和联系

Carte de l'emplacement de l'établissement
320 Sunset Ave, Venice, 洛杉矶, 美国
在地图上看到
+1 310 314 0320
我是业主
点击此处
2024
推荐
2024

Gjusta 成立于 2014 年,其唯一目的是为 Gjelina 和 GTA 餐厅供应面包并充当酒窖,如今已迅速转变为一家出色的熟食店 。它提供上好的农家面包、美味的三明治(尤其是熏牛肉)、上等的烤肉、熏鱼、帕尔马干酪炸薯条、烤蔬菜拼盘、烤鸡、鲜榨果汁......总之,整个菜单都非常美味可口。您可以打包带走,也可以在室外的小木桌上享用。


与我们的合作伙伴一起组织您的旅行 洛杉矶
运输
住宿和停留
服务/现场

成员的意见GJUSTA

3.6/5
25 通知
发送回复
质量/价格比
厨房质量
原创性
框架/联盟
服务
您已经为该机构留下评论,该评论已由Petit Futé团队验证。 您已经提交了对该机构的评论,正在等待验证,一旦验证通过,您将收到一封电子邮件。
访问于四月 2024
Very poor customer service! It is chaotic and they dont make you feel good here! What I didn't like was that there was no instructions about getting a ticket before going to the line so we waited so long until the manager told us to go get a ticket. And she was not nice about it. I felt I was discriminated against because I'm not a white lady. Also, too expensive for the amount of food they offer. Won't recommend this place!
访问于四月 2024
Todo muy rico! Un poco caro eso sí… Pero bien servido y muy buen sabor!
访问于四月 2024
damn good, worth every cent
访问于四月 2024
Service was utterly appalling, especially when you're left to fend for yourself.

After placing an order, you're abruptly confronted with a non-negotiable 25% tip automatically added to your bill, leaving no room for choice.

I won't be returning, and I strongly advise anyone enamored with this establishment to reconsider, especially tourists (don't fall for their enticing outdoor seating)!
Seo
Seo
访问于四月 2024
I was excited to visit this establishment, known for its lively atmosphere and beautiful setting. While the ambiance lived up to its reputation, a very rude encounter with a hostess significantly marred my experience.

After taking a few photos to capture the Sunday mood, I was accosted by the hostess. She claimed it was a violation to photograph employees without their consent and demanded I delete any pictures containing staff. It's important to note that taking photographs in public places is generally legal in Los Angeles. While I understand the intent to protect employee privacy, I wasn't intentionally photographing them. In reality, capturing the overall vibe of a bustling restaurant inevitably includes some employees in the background. There was also no signage indicating a photography policy, and frankly, if the hostess's approach had been respectful, I would have happily complied regardless of the legality.

Most importantly, the hostess's demeanor was extremely rude, accusatory, and threatening. This unprofessional behavior was the most disappointing aspect of the situation. It's baffling that anyone would try to prevent customers from taking photos, or even demand the deletion of photos already taken. Businesses should recognize that customers sharing great photos of the environment is free and effective marketing, ultimately benefiting the establishment itself(this last statement is only my opinion).

Even if there's a gray area regarding photographing employees unintentionally in a public space, there should be a consistent standard for privacy. If capturing employees incidentally is forbidden, shouldn't the same logic apply to the restaurant's surveillance cameras constantly recording patrons? If the logic holds, their cameras shouldn't be taking videos and photos of all customers without their consent, which doesn't make sense. This highlights the absurdity of the hostess's claim and the nonsensical nature of her demand.

This incident underscores the need for clear communication of policies and staff training on customer service. The potential for a positive experience here is high, but unfortunately, it fell short in this instance.

与我们的合作伙伴一起寻找独一无二的住宿优惠

发送回复