2024
推荐
•
2024
Gjusta 成立于 2014 年,其唯一目的是为 Gjelina 和 GTA 餐厅供应面包并充当酒窖,如今已迅速转变为一家出色的熟食店 。它提供上好的农家面包、美味的三明治(尤其是熏牛肉)、上等的烤肉、熏鱼、帕尔马干酪炸薯条、烤蔬菜拼盘、烤鸡、鲜榨果汁......总之,整个菜单都非常美味可口。您可以打包带走,也可以在室外的小木桌上享用。
广告
广告
与我们的合作伙伴一起组织您的旅行 洛杉矶
运输
预订您的航班机票
船只租赁
住宿和停留
查找酒店
假日出租
寻找你的露营地
量身定制的旅行
沉浸式旅行
服务/现场
活动和访问
寻找医生
成员的意见GJUSTA
3.6/5
25 通知
质量/价格比
厨房质量
原创性
框架/联盟
服务
与我们的合作伙伴一起寻找独一无二的住宿优惠
广告
After placing an order, you're abruptly confronted with a non-negotiable 25% tip automatically added to your bill, leaving no room for choice.
I won't be returning, and I strongly advise anyone enamored with this establishment to reconsider, especially tourists (don't fall for their enticing outdoor seating)!
After taking a few photos to capture the Sunday mood, I was accosted by the hostess. She claimed it was a violation to photograph employees without their consent and demanded I delete any pictures containing staff. It's important to note that taking photographs in public places is generally legal in Los Angeles. While I understand the intent to protect employee privacy, I wasn't intentionally photographing them. In reality, capturing the overall vibe of a bustling restaurant inevitably includes some employees in the background. There was also no signage indicating a photography policy, and frankly, if the hostess's approach had been respectful, I would have happily complied regardless of the legality.
Most importantly, the hostess's demeanor was extremely rude, accusatory, and threatening. This unprofessional behavior was the most disappointing aspect of the situation. It's baffling that anyone would try to prevent customers from taking photos, or even demand the deletion of photos already taken. Businesses should recognize that customers sharing great photos of the environment is free and effective marketing, ultimately benefiting the establishment itself(this last statement is only my opinion).
Even if there's a gray area regarding photographing employees unintentionally in a public space, there should be a consistent standard for privacy. If capturing employees incidentally is forbidden, shouldn't the same logic apply to the restaurant's surveillance cameras constantly recording patrons? If the logic holds, their cameras shouldn't be taking videos and photos of all customers without their consent, which doesn't make sense. This highlights the absurdity of the hostess's claim and the nonsensical nature of her demand.
This incident underscores the need for clear communication of policies and staff training on customer service. The potential for a positive experience here is high, but unfortunately, it fell short in this instance.