推荐
提供市场产品的巴黎美食的餐厅。
Lou quinsou是一种小Cévenol鸟,是Sergent Recruteur的前明星Antonin Bonnet在洛泽尔的童年时得到的绰号。这个男孩在Jeune Rue餐厅稍稍折了一下翅膀后,花了一点时间回到了巴黎厨房的最前沿。现在他已经做到了,而且做得很好。带有玻璃屋顶的时尚装饰,皮革长椅,漂亮的木质桌椅,设计师的落地灯,所有这些都是为了取悦那些口袋里有点钱的鉴赏家们。菜单紧跟季节,充满了Antonin Bonnet的想象力:小牛肉与香草à la cévenole,来自Cap Ferret的皇家鲷鱼,浓郁的荨麻汤软煮蛋,牺牲的黑头曼克斯羊肉和神圣的甘草汁等。灵感和和谐的组合,适应市场产品,所以我们一次又一次地回来,发现厨师的新想法。
你知道吗? 本评论由我们的专业作者撰写。
广告
广告
与我们的合作伙伴一起组织您的旅行 巴黎
运输
预订您的航班机票
自行车租赁
住宿和停留
查找酒店
假日出租
寻找你的露营地
量身定制的旅行
服务/现场
活动和访问
激活 VPN
申请签证
旅行保险
成员的意见QUINSOU
4.2/5
63 通知
质量/价格比
厨房质量
原创性
框架/联盟
服务
以下评分和评论反映的是会员的主观意见,而非 The Little Witty 的观点。
访问于二月 2025
Super cuisine
访问于二月 2025
Nous avons passé une excellente soirée dans ce joli restaurant étoilé à la cuisine aussi raffinée que délicieuse.
L'excellent menu en 5 tours est magnifié par les explications du personnel aux petits soins.
Je recommande vivement cette sympathique expérience culinaire.
L'excellent menu en 5 tours est magnifié par les explications du personnel aux petits soins.
Je recommande vivement cette sympathique expérience culinaire.
访问于一月 2025
Expérience culinaire qui réveille les papilles????
访问于十二月 2024
Cuisine raffinée dans une ambiance bistronomique agréable. Menu avec prix raisonnable pour un étoilé Michelin.Très bon service. Point négatif: le prix des vins limite rédhibitoire.
与我们的合作伙伴一起寻找独一无二的假期优惠

» My visit: March 2025
» Total score: 4.4/5 – good to very good
» Comment: In my opinion, the food tasted very good. I would particularly highlight the dessert, which I found outstanding overall. I also thought the wines were very good overall.
The restaurant is supposed to be a gourmet restaurant and describes itself as such on its website ("Restaurant Gastronomique"). Having said that, I would suggest that they could inform their guests on their website not to expect the usual fine-dining ambience. Rather the ambience of a cramped down the road bistro.
Besides, I would suggest turning up the heat and fixing what I thought was bad lighting. Last but not least, I have one final suggestion: Please ban all pets (yes, even the cute little ones) from the dining room and start with the dog that apparently belongs to one of the team members and which kept appearing behind me throughout the evening.
1|122|69
=====
My ratings for this gourmet restaurant in detail:
●● Service – 4.6/5 – still very good:
● Hospitality, friendliness, obligingness, etc.: 4.6/5
● Atmosphere, temper, facilitation, etc.: 4.5/5
●● Food – 4.5/5 – good to very good:
● Flavors (range, depth, composition, harmony/balance, etc.): 4,7/5
● Level (thoroughness, craftsmanship, originality, exclusivity, variety of impressions, consistency/diversity, etc.): 4,4/5
● Choices: 4,3/5
●● Beverages, mainly the wines – 4.7/5 – very good:
● Taste (depth/range, length, complexity, balance, accessibility, elegance, intensity/subtlety, etc.): 4.7/5
● Level (variety/novelty of impressions, consistency/diversity, exclusivity, etc.): 4.8/5
● Did the beverages (mainly the wines) match the dishes?: 4.7/5
● Choices: 3.9/5
●● Presentation of the food – 3.7/5 – satisfactory:
● Textures and (differences in) temperatures: 3.7/5
● Colors and decorations: 3.4/5
● Timing and sequencing as well as sizes of portions: 3.9/5
● Special effects (positionings, DIY-effects, sculptural or thematic elements, surprises, color and motion effects, fake effects, olfactory effects, fog or smoke effects, etc.): 2.9/5
● Procedures at and around the table (attunements and explanations, elements added/changed, service and staffing intensity, involvement of kitchen team, orchestrated dish presentations, preparations and dishes (partially) built up at the table, etc.): 4.4/5
●● Presentation of beverages, mainly the wines – 4.6/5 – still very good:
● Procedures at and around the table (explanations and attunements, etc.): 4.4/5
● Quantities poured as well as timing in relation to the dishes: 4.9/5
●● Premises and location – 3.5/5 – sufficient to satisfactory:
● Accessibility, surroundings and - as applicable - the view: 4.1/5
● How did I like the room or - as applicable - outdoor area’s style, decor and atmosphere?: 4.1/5
● Well-being (space, privacy, temperature, ventilation/odors, lighting, soundscape, sanitary facilities, etc.): 2.8/5
●● Price – 4.5/5 – good to very good:
● Price-performance ratio for food: 4.4/5
● Price-performance ratio for wines and other beverages: 4.5/5
● Price transparency and correspondence of the expected to the actual price (simple, complete and unambiguous price information on the restaurant's website and in the menu, etc.): 4.6/5