INTERNATIONAL STUDENT CENTER
宾馆
•
€
2024
推荐
•
2024
在纽约中央公园附近的酒店,有最便宜的房间。
这些都是纽约最便宜的房间!该酒店只接待35岁以下的外国人。本年度,该酒店预订不足,请提前预订。卧室空间大,可容纳10个房间。该区很平静,还有一个小问题,中央公园就在附近。有互联网,美食和沙龙,有电视。厕所是分开的。这套房子并不年轻,但在经济上确实是一个很好的计划。对于那些单纯的旅行者或学生来说,这是一个值得推荐的地方。
广告
广告
与我们的合作伙伴一起组织您的旅行 纽约(曼哈顿)
运输
预订您的航班机票
船只租赁
住宿和停留
查找酒店
假日出租
寻找你的露营地
量身定制的旅行
沉浸式旅行
服务/现场
活动和访问
寻找医生
比较并预订住宿 INTERNATIONAL STUDENT CENTER
成员的意见INTERNATIONAL STUDENT CENTER
4.4/5
24 通知
质量/价格比
地点
洁净度
设置/氛围
服务
查找附近的酒店
与我们的合作伙伴一起寻找独一无二的住宿优惠
广告
To begin this review, the hostel is deeply unsanitary: there were two bathrooms on my floor (four rooms). This is by no means adequate and on my first morning in the hostel I had to get dressed in a laundry closet. The bathrooms are falling apart, with decrepit fixtures and frankly disgusting furniture (see pictures). There was no hot water on my three attempts to shower. The staff make the claim that there is, in fact, hot water, and that there isn't hot water is a charming quirk inherent to the building being a historic brownstone – a poor excuse. Judging by the quantity of detritus in my dorm, they are cleaned infrequently if ever.
Second, the rooms are insecure to the point where I felt unsafe. The dorms do not lock, and so anyone who can make it into the building can access any dorm. The only secure place to store valuables, etc. are small and flimsy key lockers, and even then the hostel does not give out keys willingly: I had to argue with the receptionist to get one. Judging by if ever. Beyond the bunks and lockers, the dorms are furnished only with a few items of bric-a-brac in various states of disrepair (my bunk had a broken CD tower that I guess was meant to be a bedside table) meaning that the top bunks do not have access to amenities such as dedicated plug sockets, reading lights, or shelves. For some reason, there is not Wi-Fi on the upper floors, meaning that if you need to look something up then you have a long climb ahead of you.
While the hostel has tried to make the common areas nice, and have succeeded in part, the reception area doubles as a man-cave of sorts for the staff with their XBox and drum kit, and the kitchen in the basement, though new, is ill-equipped.
As I said, I left over a week early. When I told the member of staff on reception that I was leaving and why, he tried to get into an argument that left me feeling more than a little gaslit. Apparently, the bathrooms pictured aren't an issue because it's an old building, but also the only reason I was leaving was because I had to ask for a locker key – and a guest feeling fearful that someone might walk off with their passport, etc., was not an issue for him. Out of politeness I had taken my sheets downstairs in order to check out as per the hostel's request. Apparently this was the wrong thing to do as he then yelled out as I walked down the street, asking me to climb back up to the top floor to deposit my sheets back in the dorm – truly a masterclass in reading the room.
Since leaving, I have received multiple emails from the hostel management, the last of which was 500+ words and cc'd in Hostelworld (through whom I'd booked). Each of these emails has been defensive to the point of passive-aggression, attempting to exculpate the hostel. Apparently, the hostel has decrepit, non-functioning bathrooms, etc., because it is a "historic 1915 brownstone [which] has a lot of classic charm with a few quirks." And apparently I was the one who was at fault as "many concerns were not voiced until your decision to depart early." Bizarre behaviour.
Do not, under any circumstance, book this hostel.